Re: XML vs. Name Value pair was ->RE: [WEB400] XML and RPG-CGI, is X ML needed. was -> HolyWar . . ..

["Brad Stone" <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:44:18 -0500 
 "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The nice thing about Apache is that it decodes the
> content of the post back
> to normal, meaning it takes out all encodings like %20.
>  With Classic you
> have to decode it manually, unless there is a setting I
> have missed.  I like
> Classic better than Apache except for above reason.

Almost forget about this one,

Yes, classic does.  I guess I've never run across that
problem.. you must be trying to cheat or something with
your programs.  Ha..

Nope, I haven't one ONE single advantage to Apache over
classic.  Well, the information for Apache is everywhere,
but it doesn't really always apply to the iseries version
of the server either (ie configuring CGI for example...)
 Oh, and I guess IBM dropping Classic for Apache is another
advantage, however forced it is.

Brad