|
Jon, Based on what I see hereon: Don't' remember saying anything about XPF, but....It's not a "wild generalization" to say that most hereon don't talk in the same industry standard terms of application development languages and database creation and manipulation against an RDBMS, like your competition does, except for the Presentation Layer. That's what separates it from the rest of the IT world, why it's seen as a niche platform and doesn't get taken seriously when it comes time to buy a new platform, many times out of a 100. I wish it weren't so and I hope its changing.. However, if you are talking in the terms I mention, I applaud you because only then will you be taken seriously in the rest of IT. Sincerely, Dave >>> Jon.Paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2/24/2006 14:33:47 >>> >> You are one of the very few that have responded to this that GET IT and has done something to improve the image of the platform!! You are generalizing wildly again Dave. Most of us who responded _have_ done the same thing. Some of us spend our working lives doing nothing but trying to educate others on how to modernize XPF applications. Just because we don't agree with you that SQL is the answer to everything doesn't mean that we don't work to improve the image of the platform. P.S. Kudos to Mike for applying a philosophy of "right tool for the job" rather than simply throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com www.RPGWorld.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.