|
So far, my position on Rails is pretty favorable. It would be good to talk about it's shortcomings too. In it's favor, IBM is building a database interface. A lot of people are beginning to talk about it. Rails is stirring discussion across the board. Java and .Net developers are beginning to take notice. It's based on an OO language and design principles. The development and runtime environments are interpretive, instead of compiled. The time saver tools, MVC orientation, and integrated interfaces are beginning to make PHP look third-rate. Like .jsp and .aspx environments, HTML templates are encapsulated into software objects that are generated automatically at runtime. People are beginning to wonder if Rails will throw J2EE and .aspx development on their respective ears. I agree that's pretty imaginative. How could a few young programmers, collaborating in an open-source environment, challenge some of the most powerful corporations on earth? Speculating about global trends is hard for anyone. Who knows if $100 laptops and students and open-source projects will have far reaching effects? On the other hand, people are thinking globally, and conditions on the other side of the world could have an effect on the way we do things in the US. Nathan. ----- Original Message ---- From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 4:48:47 PM Subject: Re: [WEB400] Ruby On Rails on the iSeries
From: Nathan Andelin Perhaps a few of my observations about WDSC and EGL comes across as FUD, but that's probably true in any point/counter-point discussion. I've just been getting in to WDSC lately, myself. Colleagues in our local users group have remarked about updates destabilizing their PCs.
Again, please note time and date of these observations. What version are they on? Have they been on this list? Have they asked questions of other WDSC users? There were problems as WDSC evolved and while it's not bug-free today, it's far advanced from where it was. By the way... do you think Ruby is entirely stable? You might want to read a little about it.
Perhaps if you have enough memory and CPU it's not a problem. That's been the standard answer for PC environments for a couple of decades. But we may be entering an era where less, instead of more, is better.
You think we will start using slower PCs with less memory and smaller disks? I applaud you for a creative and interesting look at a possible future world. I wouldn't bet the farm on it, though. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.