|
From: Nathan Andelin Perhaps a few of my observations about WDSC and EGL comes across as FUD, but that's probably true in any point/counter-point discussion. I've just been getting in to WDSC lately, myself. Colleagues in our local users group have remarked about updates destabilizing their PCs.
Again, please note time and date of these observations. What version are they on? Have they been on this list? Have they asked questions of other WDSC users? There were problems as WDSC evolved and while it's not bug-free today, it's far advanced from where it was. By the way... do you think Ruby is entirely stable? You might want to read a little about it.
Perhaps if you have enough memory and CPU it's not a problem. That's been the standard answer for PC environments for a couple of decades. But we may be entering an era where less, instead of more, is better.
You think we will start using slower PCs with less memory and smaller disks? I applaud you for a creative and interesting look at a possible future world. I wouldn't bet the farm on it, though. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.