Re: Recommendationsofwebdevelopmentarchitecture/toolfordiverse i5 access...

Because it wouldn't be IBM if your tongue didn't end up in a knot trying
to say it.

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of albartell
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 2:59 PM
To: 'Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries'
Subject: Re: [WEB400]
Recommendationsofwebdevelopmentarchitecture/toolfordiverse i5 access...

Well there we go. I learned something new today and can go home now :-)
Why couldn't the System i5 come up with a simple name like that for a
web
user instead of QTMHHTP1? :-)

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com


-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On
Behalf Of Matt.Haas@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 1:45 PM
To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Recommendations
ofwebdevelopmentarchitecture/toolfordiverse i5 access...

Actually, on UNIX boxes there is a user called nobody and that's the
user
most web processes run under by default.

Matt