Bradley V. Stone wrote:
Alright, Joe, when the H-E double hockey sticks did I say I was anti-AJAX.
Heeeeeeeeee! Okay, perhaps "anti" is a bit strong, but certainly not "pro". You made a pretty strong statement that you don't think AJAX fits very often:

"I've put together quite a few nice systems, although decided against AJAX
for most of them. I am using it in one application now I'm writing for a
county clerk's office. I showed it to Aaron. While simple, it does work
nice as far as making it more "user friendly" and the hardest part was
putting together (actually finding online!) an AJAX library to plug in so I
could make multiple connections at once. That took all of 10 minutes.
Implementing it took all of 30.

The problem is, right now it's only internal. It's one case in all the
projects I've done where I thought AJAX fit perfectly."


Is that "anti-AJAX". Perhaps not. But it's far from a ringing endorsement, whereas the examples Nathan showed us were from the ground up dependent on AJAX. Just a slight architectural disconnect, is all.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.