Bradley V. Stone wrote:
Bradley V. Stone wrote:

Is that "anti-AJAX". Perhaps not. But it's far from a ringing
endorsement, whereas the examples Nathan showed us were from the ground
up dependent on AJAX. Just a slight architectural disconnect, is all.

WOW! WOW!

Now I have to use AJAX for EVERYTHING in EVERY application even if it's not
the right fit or I'm not endorsing a particular technology? Keep
backpeddling, man. You're way off on this point.
Oh. My. Gosh. Dude, try decaf.

I'm not way off of anything. I just said that your comment, that you only found AJAX valuable in a single application, is not a ringing endorsement of AJAX.

It's not an indictment, and if you feel it necessary to scream and hop up and down on one foot and point fingers and say I'm the devil incarnate, go ahead. I don't really care. If you do endorse AJAX, then great! Your statement to me indicated a rather tepid attitude towards the technology. Sorry to misrepresent you so vilely! <chuckle>

But really, decaf. It's a life saver.

Joe


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.