Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Or the database would be smart enough to keep the query
active and allow the resultset to navigate. This is currently
what I expect the i to be able to.

I'm currious why you'd "expect" IBM i to do that? Is it part of an SQL or JDBC specification? If not, then why not use a persistent connection, or design your own solution for navigating an 11 million row result set?

Nathan.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.