Aaron Bartell wrote:
I don't enjoy the faces-config.xml file that much either. I believe the
latter versions of JSF use annotations to address these issues.
Don't count on it. JSF 2.0 is still pretty soft, and their focus seems to be more on some other things (like Ajax). I'll be interested, actually, to see what does make it into JSF 2.0. I haven't been following that particular thing because I hated JSF so much when I first saw it.

But I have to admit that technologies can get a lot better with time - it seems that in some cases the developers listen to the community and good things happen. Take a look at EJB3. Through the use of annotations and a revamp of the entire philosophy to take advantage of things that work (like Hibernate), EJB3 looks nothing like older EJB implementations and in fact it may be worth revisiting.

My latest article on MC gives an overview:

http://www.mcpressonline.com/websphere/general/ejb3-and-websphere-a-harmonious-union.html

Joe


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.