On 31/07/2008, at 6:14 AM, vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
This way if ActiveX is supported with this object type, we're good
to go - otherwise I have the alternative code path.
If you have an alternate code path that is cross-browser compatible
then why on earth are you bothering with IE-specific stuff?
Especially something as horrible as ActiveX? (OK, WinDOS-specific
stuff since other browsers can use ActiveX but it's still horrible.)
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.