But it's going away about as fast as RPG and COBOL have.

That's not comparing apples to apples. RPG and COBOL had A LOT more time to
become adopted vs. Net.Data.

Let me put it this way (which relates to the OP): Would you recommend
Net.Data as a direction to build new apps on the IBM i for long term
viability?

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com

On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:56 AM, <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It's a mature product - it works, it has no problems hardly at all. It got
the ability to handle Java calls when it needed to. It gets PTFs. What's the
problem here?

Yeah, it's not highly visible - might be its worst problem. But it's going
away about as fast as RPG and COBOL have. Under the same predicitions.

As to observation - look at the site for ND on i that IBM has. Look at the
announcements - I just glanced at them and do not have dates and timeframes.
But stuff IS happening with it. One developer on it? OK - it doesn't need
more if it's basically working.

OK - back to my vacation!


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.