Hi Vern,

It's a mature product - it works, it has no problems hardly at all.
It got the ability to handle Java calls when it needed to. It gets
PTFs. What's the problem here?

The problem is market traction. Net.Data has never had much traction in the market. Originally, it was cross-platform, but nobody used it except on i -- so it was phased out. Even on i the number of developers interested in it are a tiny percentage of the industry.

So that's the problem -- traction -- Net.Data has very little traction. Very little adoption. You can't say that about RPG or Cobol. Cobol has refused to die because there's so much software written in it. RPG is still where 70% of i developement is done.. so while RPG is small potatoes in the larger industry, it's "the king" in the System i space.

Net.Data is neither.

So why would someone want to use Net.Data? What advantage does it have over anything else out there? (Is "better integration with REXX" really a valid reason?)

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.