Nathan Andelin skrev:
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Unfortunately this doesn't scale well. You need to be able to serve more users than you have database connections.


I understand that if persistent connections are maintained for each user, that may lead to many database connections, but what resource constraint do you see?
In my experience database connections are heavy weight objects and should be kept to a minimum. I do not know the maximum number of concurrent AS/400 database connections, but it might be an interesting number to work out.

My point is that the practical number of users which the Java part can handle may be much higher than the practical number of concurrent connections the database can handle. Hence you hit a wall faster.

/Thorbjørn

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.