I understand that if persistent connections are maintained for
each user, that may lead to many database connections, but what
resource constraint do you see?

Well, I guess that depends on the scale and audience of the application,
no? For an internal application if you just consider the web app as a
nicer version of a green screen app, but still for internal consumption
then I don't think you'll hit any limits. After all, if your i could
handle n-hundred connections before (as a greenscreen) then you should
be ok to handle n-hundred connections now as a web-app.

But... if this is an internet facing application then while the machine
may handle n-hundred connections what will happen when there are
n-thousand requests? Or n-million? Either because you're really
successful, or because of a accidential (or intentional) DOS attack.

Been a while since I looked at the system limits documentation, but I'd
think you'd need a decent sized i to handle 50K active jobs, probably
one of the largest for 500K active job (if even possible) and I doubt
any i would handle 5M active jobs.

-Walden



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.