From: Aaron Bartell
Obviously successful is a relative term, but I would define a new
 UI technology a success if they could reach the same simplicity
 and efficiency that we have with 5250 applications.

Well, if you want the same simplicity and efficiency as 5250, then you might as well use 5250 ... but I kind-of get your drift, which was underscored when I tried SugarCRM at the yip link that you referenced in an earlier post.  SugarCRM is typical of Web applications, but I found it to be tedious to work with - not something I'd like to be subjected to on a daily basis.

From a user perspective, a browser UI can actually be more efficient than 5250 ... sometimes.  Post a form submit using AJAX, where the only response returned from the server is a completion message - perhaps 60 bytes.  Over a LAN, the response completes and the message is shown in about 2 milliseconds.  Granted, that most Web applications are not designed that way, but it is possible.

Nathan.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.