Re: Is this really new ?

[Steve Richter <stephenrichter@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Aaron Bartell <aaronbartell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >duplicating a srvpgm to change the behavior of a single exported
> procedure sounds lile problems waiting to happen. What about when the
> original srvpgm is recreated?
>
> Hmm... Maybe if you could describe what you are trying to accomplish
> (the end goal and the reason behind it) I will be able to understand you
> position better.  Note that you *can* currently dynamically invoke *PGM
> and *SRVPGM objects.  Also note that your program has to know the
> procedure parameters at compile time (which is maybe what you are
> griping about, and if it is I can share your gripe).

Aaron,

forget about it. I am not trying to advance any idea for improving
srvpgms. Just giving examples to illustrate that there are some things
the closed source OS owner has to do to improve the system vs a lot of
other features like IDEs and Web servers which can be created by the
users of the OS.

-Steve