Re: powerEXT - Clarifications from the author -- WEB400

Subject: Re: powerEXT - Clarifications from the author
From: Aaron Bartell <aaronbartell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:01:50 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Here's where I get lost, sorry for being dense...

and you chose to offer it as properitary

In most of my current scenarios I would be using it for home grown in-house
applications, so I am not offering to sell proprietary software, ExtJS in
fact never leaves my network. Would my home grown in-house app still need
to be open sourced in that case in your opinion?

Sorry again for being dense.

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
http://mowyourlawn.com/blog/

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:07 PM, <hr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Aaron,

as long as you build software on other peoples software and it can't run
without it - and you chose to offer it as properitary - you are under the
license rule of paying downwards.
Regards
Henrik

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: powerEXT - Clarifications from the author , hr

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.