The remark was somewhat tongue-in-cheek Aaron - but it seems to me that licensing is certainly an issue in this thread and that doesn't bode well for the future. If/when RPG's open I/O model comes to fruition it just seemed to me that that if it all gets bogged down with this kind of discussion we can only look to commercial vendors to make add-ons available.

But then maybe I'm just feeing old and cranky today.

What license does Scott K. use for his stuff I wonder?


Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com



On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:00 PM, web400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

But do you really think licensing is the reason? I just think the majority
of RPG coders aren't interested in it because all of their basic needs were
met up until 8 to 10 years ago.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.