Hmmm... I would actually vote for something like that. Basically you are
wanting user defined data types.

Is it happy hour yet?

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
http://mowyourlawn.com/blog/


On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Neill Harper <neill.harper@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

I don't understand what you mean by scope executes asyncrone?

Scope isn't that hard to understand, and already exists in RPG sub
procedures anyway?

May be RPG doesn't need full OO abilities, but all I can say is my bext
most
flexible RPGIV code has been written in a pseudo oo fashion.

Where a handle is returned to represent the object and it is passed to
"member methods" that accept the object as a parameter.

Would it really be hard for IBM to put some syntactic sugar around that and
pass it off as OO.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.