Re: PDF Performance

[Mike <koldark@xxxxxxxxx>]

It seems for Java on the i, the more memory the better. (I guess that is the
same for most computers)

--
Mike Wills
http://mikewills.info
P: (507) 933-0880 | Skype: koldark


On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> One thing that motivated me to download pd4ml was a performance benchmark,
> published on their web site, which indicated much higher throughput than
> that of my testing with Aaron Bartell's HTML2PDF4i utility.  My original
> thought was that a performance advantage alone might justify the additional
> cost of a pd4ml license.  However, both utilities appear to offer identical
> performance in generating an identical 150 page PDF document on my server.
>
> That may not be saying much.  It takes 2 minutes to generate that PDF on my
> server.  To be honest, that kind of performance is a bit repulsive to me.
>  I've done a number of performance tests, and I think these Java jars may be
> a case where my 1 Gig of RAM, is insufficient.
>
> Performance may be a moot point, however.  PDF reports are a requirement!
>
> Any thoughts about performance?
>
> -Nathan.
>
>
>
>
> --
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.