The analogy is flawed a bit on the J2EE side, but it's interesting. I'd
say it's more suited to debate the merits of 1-tier vs. n-tier than
RPG vs. Java EE.


________________________________________
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nathan Andelin [nandelin@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 5:44 PM
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2?

From: Paul Tuohy
I think language efficiency comes well down the list after the hardware


Let's say that part of scalability is the "ability" to effectively use the
"hardware". Here's an analogy. Let's say we're operating a restaurant where
waiters take orders for "sodas" from customers, while sitting at their tables.
Waiters then go to a soda fountain to fill up cups and return them to tables.
Let's say the soda fountain has 64 dispensers which can output any available
flavor. The process is automated so that all dispensers can be working, serving
all waiters simultaneously.

Sometime later, management decides to add a staging area for soda orders, which
is manned by 4 workers. Waiters go to the staging area and place their orders
there. A staging area worker takes the order to the soda fountain, returns with
cups full of soda, empties the contents into other cups, discards the original
cups, and waiters finally return orders to tables. Every once in a while one of
the staging area workers is dispatched to collect garbage.

Which operation is more efficient? Which operation is more scalable? Which
operation is more likely to retain (please) customers?

The soda fountain is a 64 core IBM i server. The staging area is a 4 core Intel
server, running J2EE application servers. Customer tables are browsers.

-Nathan




--
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.