Re: Why the IBM i *might* not be a good web server -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Why the IBM i *might* not be a good web server
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:39:26 -0800 (PST)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: Aaron Bartell
Do you have references for this? I would like to evangelize them
also, but want to make sure I understand the data.

http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh110110-story01-table01.html

Well, TPM figured that an IBM i model 720 offered better price/performance than
an HP server running Windows and SQL Server Standard.

-Nathan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.