Good question - the DB2 engine on i for mySql was just that - a way to store data defined in mySql in a different way. Postgresql is self-contained, so far as I know. Does it have plugins for storage engines that are similar to what mySql has? If not, there's no reason to go with it. The mySql effort seems related to PHP, et al. The engine made is possible to read mySql data in native programs. Again, no similar purpose exists with any other RDBMS that I'm aware of.

Regards
Vern

On 12/18/2010 2:21 PM, Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
-snip-
Why would you choose PostgreSQL instead of DB2/400 which works out of
the box?

/Thorbjørn


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.