Re: Websockets on the IBMi -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Websockets on the IBMi
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: Kevin Turner
I think we will have to agree to disagree.

That's okay with me. I considered suggesting the same. I don't wan't the conversation to become tedious for anyone. I don't want anyone to think I'm dissing on Web Sockets, either. I think it's an important technology, and we need to understand it. Thanks for the suggestion about using wireshark to observe an open WS connection. I think I'll try that. I was searching for a way to do that with Fiddler, but couldn't find one. I'm somewhat hopeful that someone will implement or port an Apache module so that we don't have to implement another server just to support Web Sockets.

-Nathan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Websockets on the IBMi , Maurice O'Prey

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.