Nathan,

I am too new to all of this to have a lot of expectations. I grew up on the IBM i as an OPM COBOL developer, and I still pretty much do OPM COBOL development when it comes to the IBM i. So I'm mostly trying to figure out how things work with node on the IBM i.

The only .NET interface that I have heard about is the .NET Provider. This reflects my knowledge, not what might be available.

It seems to me that node offers more flexibility than the .NET Provider in terms of access to IBM i resources. They can both use SQL to perform CRUD operations on DB2 files. They can both call CL, RPG and COBOL programs, though you have to create stored procedures to do so with the .NET Provider. Toolkit for i (using XMLSERVICE) lets node access some resources that the .NET Provider cannot, like data queues, user spaces, individual CL commands, user profiles, and more.

I am curious whether or not node scales more efficiently than the .NET Provider in terms of concurrent users. I develop apps used by employees. We have about 4,000-5,000 employees and growing. We're definitely not talking large-scale by Internet standards. I suspect both node and the .NET Provider can handle 4,000-5,000 concurrent users. I'm just curious which handles concurrent users more efficiently in terms of CPU%.

Thanks,
Kelly


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.