Re: Apache vs Express for Node -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Apache vs Express for Node
From: Bradley Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:27:35 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Special snowflake? How is it different than any other app/model that spits
out data to stdout?

What cost/risks do you see?

When you use a web app, can you honestly say "well, this is using CGI" or
"this is using something mainstream"?

Brad
www.bvstools.com

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

CGI is kind of a "special snowflake" and not even IBM is behind it still.
There are costs/risks associated with not being mainstream. We're using
it, but really only until something better comes along.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Apache vs Express for Node , Justin Taylor

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.