Re: Using Node w/ Apache -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Using Node w/ Apache
From: Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:11:43 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I've wondering the same thing about apps implementing their own HTTP service. It seems to me you'd have each app listening on its own port. Is that good?

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Andelin [mailto:nandelin@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 11:31 PM
To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Using Node w/ Apache

What is not to like about the HTTP server capabilities in node?

I find it very cool that applications can implement their own HTTP server - that Node makes that trivial. On the other hand, I question the wisdom of every application implementing its own HTTP service.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Using Node w/ Apache , Aaron Bartell
Re: Using Node w/ Apache , Nathan Andelin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.