Re: Using Node w/ Apache -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Using Node w/ Apache
From: Aaron Bartell <aaronbartell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:25:02 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I think that would be a bad implementation of Node.

On Dec 15, 2016 5:22 PM, "Nathan Andelin" <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I've wondering the same thing about apps implementing their own HTTP
service. It seems to me you'd have each app listening on its own port.

that good?

Say you have 500+ CRUD applications for maintaining the 500+ tables in your
DB. 500+ Node instances? 500+ TCP/IP ports allocated?
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.