Re: In-house authentication & authorization

["Mark Murphy/STAR BASE Consulting Inc." <mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Choose a framework, authentication and authorization are some of the things a good framework will do for you. That way you don't have to write it yourself.

Mark Murphy
Atlas Data Systems
mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Bradley Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: ----- 
To: "Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)" <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Bradley Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/22/2016 12:04AM
Subject: Re: [WEB400] In-house authentication & authorization


Its easy to add authentication that uses the IBM i user ids and passwords
with the apache server.   I personally don't like basic authentication but
in your case it would remove redundancy of ids and passwords.

Brad
www.bvstools.com

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm curious people's thoughts on authentication and authorization for
> in-house web apps.  Back in the old days of 5250, it was baked in. These
> days,  there seems to be a dizzying array of options.
> --
> This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.