In-house authentication & authorization -- WEB400

Subject: In-house authentication & authorization
From: Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:27:08 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I'm curious people's thoughts on authentication and authorization for in-house web apps. Back in the old days of 5250, it was baked in. These days, there seems to be a dizzying array of options.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: In-house authentication & authorization , Bradley Stone
Re: In-house authentication & authorization , Mark Murphy/STAR BASE Consulting Inc.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.