Re: Rise of Node -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Rise of Node
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 22:40:59 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Aaron Bartell <aaronbartell@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Is there really a case to be made for Node doing it all?

In my mind, yes.

Say you have an application with a form that prompts for eight (8) fields,
each of which is a surrogate key reference to eight separate tables.
Validating the form requires the application to ensure that the eight
values submitted on the form must exist in eight separate tables. What
would the JavaScript look like? How would it perform? How long would the
user be waiting for a response saying that the input was successful?

Frankly, I'm skeptical about Node handling that type of validation and
returning appropriate (sensible) messages to users.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Rise of Node , Aaron Bartell
Re: Rise of Node , Tim Fathers

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.