Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ibm_db node module and IBM Data Server Driver

[Raul Jager <raul@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Regardless of CGI better or Node better in the i, supported by the
database Node on i can be better than other platforms.  If CGI is even
better or not, does not change the difference of Node in i with respect
to Node in other server..


On 04/10/2018 02:01 PM, Vernon Hamberg wrote:
> Kelly - I have to ask - when you say CGI, just what do you mean?
> CGIDEV2 as implemented on IBM i, or the general meaning of CGI as
> "common gateway interface"?
>
> So far as I know, everything that writes interactive apps to the web
> is using CGI in the latter sense. PHP, ASP.Net, classic ASP, CGIDEV2,
> the CGI APIs on IBM i, they all generate a text stream with the
> various CGI operations (whatever they're to be called).
>
> So I'm just looking for some clarification, if you please!!
>
> Vern
>
> On 4/10/2018 10:20 AM, Kelly Cookson wrote:
> > I doubt that node runs better on other servers than on the IBM i.
> >
> > I was thinking this:
> >
> > 1.     Node has better performance than CGI under conditions of very
> > high concurrency.
> >
> > 2.     Because of how node was ported to IBM i, it performs no better
> > than CGI.
> >
> > 3.     Therefore, to get the best performance with node, run it on
> > servers other than IBM i.
> >
> > I actually suspect that #2 above is false. That would mean #3 does
> > not follow. But if #1 and #2 above are true, then, to my mind, #3
> > makes sense.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Kelly Cookson
> > IT Project Leader
> > Dot Foods, Inc.
> > 217-773-4486 ext. 12676
> > www.dotfoods.com<http://www.dotfoods.com>
> > .


-- Este e-mail fue enviado desde el Mail Server del diario ABC Color -- 
            -- Verificado por Anti-Virus Corporativo Symantec --