Maria vs. DB2 performance on IBM i -- WEB400

Subject: Maria vs. DB2 performance on IBM i
From: <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 09:49:46 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Folks:

Anyone have experience with Maria vs. DB2 (Maria using the DB2 engine) on a
moderate to low used web site (PHP)?

I am trying to decide with a newer web site if it's worth moving the data
into DB2 vs. leaving it in Maria.

The obvious recovery/backup, and access from IBM i traditional programs
notwithstanding, is there a compelling reason to move the data?

--

Jim Oberholtzer

Agile Technology Architects

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Maria vs. DB2 performance on IBM i , Jon Paris
Re: Maria vs. DB2 performance on IBM i , Nathan Andelin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.