The native Maria storage engine, but your intuition question is exactly what
I'm asking. Yes, I would ordinarily agree with you but, is it worth the
extra work to move the data?
--
Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects
-----Original Message-----
From: WEB400 <web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Nathan Andelin
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 11:20 AM
To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Maria vs. DB2 performance on IBM i
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 8:50 AM <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am trying to decide with a newer web site if it's worth moving the
data into DB2 vs. leaving it in Maria.
When you say "leaving it in Maria", what storage engine are you referring to
(i.e. MyISAM, InnoDB, CSV)? My intuition says that using the IBMDB2i storage
engine would perform better than a storage engine that referenced a bulk IFS
file. But I haven't seen any benchmarks to prove it.
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
list To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/web400.
midrange.com
