Re: Maria vs. DB2 performance on IBM i -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Maria vs. DB2 performance on IBM i
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 11:31:28 -0700
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:17 AM Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

We were not that worried about performance so I didn't attempt to measure
it but I suspect there has to be some overhead in using it.

In regard to "overhead", wouldn't that be true for *ANY and *ALL storage
engines, not just the one for DB2 for i? MySQL and MariaDB are designed to
connect to a storage engine. It's just a question of which performs the
best. The MariaDB Foundation has some suggestions.

https://mariadb.com/kb/en/choosing-the-right-storage-engine/

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.