RE: MIDRANGE-L Digest V1 #635

[James Turnbull <jamest@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The Win95 implementation of CA suffers from problems because of two key
problems:  the inherent instability of Win95 and the speed in which IBM
literally 'threw' the client onto the market.  Yet again AS/400 sites
act like IBM's beta testers for what is supposed to be a finished
product.  I think both parties, IBM and Microsoft, have a lot to answer
for in the product delivery area.

James Turnbull

AS/Tech Consulting
                                                 

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   boothm@earth.goddard.edu [SMTP:boothm@earth.goddard.edu]
        Sent:   Friday, 5 September 1997 10:09
        To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        Subject:        Re: MIDRANGE-L Digest V1 #635

        I have a question or two on this: 

        The AS/400in all other areas is reliable and straight forward
without too
        much hassle.

        It seems to me that only the Win95 client that is having the
problem, so
        why is everyone upset with IBM?  Why not get upset with the
people at
        Microsoft that are making the moving target? 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---