RE: SNADS over TCP/IP

[Tim McCarthy <TimM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken & Gloria Cox [SMTP:kgc@swbell.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 1999 12:15 AM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      RE: SNADS over TCP/IP
> 
        >I agree. Snads is outdated. FTP is the protocol of the future.

        Hmmm, SNADS outdated? May I respectfully suggest you make a
closer technical comparison between these two utilities. If you're
referring simply to SNADS file transfer capabilities (never mind the
other SERVICES that SNADS offers) I can think of several reasons why
SNADS is superior...queuing, storing, reliability. True FTP is more
universally available but...SNADS outdated?
          


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---