Re: *SAVF - Compressed?

[prumschlag@xxxxxxxxxx]

I must not be the only old-timer around.  Nobody asked me who Pogo is!

But seriously, thanks for all the responses.  The DTACPR(*YES) option worked
great.  I had looked at it before, but had convinced myself that it only applied
to tape devices - wrong again.

Phil




Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:35:17 -0600
From: "Bill Albert" <balbert@bayinfosys.com>
Subject: Re: *SAVF - Compressed?

If you know who Pogo is, it is no wonder your memory ain'y what it used to
be.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: <prumschlag@phdinc.com>
To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 3:40 PM
Subject: *SAVF - Compressed?


>
>
> I have not had to deal with the issue of *SAVF files for a while, but I
need to
> review some old turf.  Unfortunately, my memory ain't what it used to be
(but to
> paraphrase Pogo, it never was).
>
> Anyhow, I did a SAVLIB to a *SAVF and expected the disk space required for
the
> save file to be less than the original library, but it is not.  I have
searched
> several manuals (and the archives for this list) but can find no reference
to
> tell me what file size to expect.  Am I missing an option, or is that just
the
> way it is?
>
> Phil


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---