MWalter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said the following on 12/29/2004 9:42 AM:
On our system it's the opposite. The QPACTLxxx controllers are attached to
the QPADEVxxx devices and the QVIRCxxxx controller is attached to the named
devices.

Thanks,

Mark

Mark D. Walter
Senior Programmer/Analyst
CCX, Inc.
mwalter@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ccxinc.com


Tom Hightower <tomh5480@xxxxxxx om> To Sent by: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx midrange-l-bounce cc s+mwalter=hanover wire.com@midrange Subject .com Re: What is *VWS-type QVIRCD0001 controller used for? 12/29/2004 10:37 AM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@midra nge.com>





MWalter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said the following on 12/29/2004 8:29 AM:

It's a virtual workstation controller for TCP/IP Telnet sessions. I

believe

the system will create it on the fly as it needs it.

Thanks,

Mark



That's what I thought.  So what's the difference between the QVIRCxxxx
and QPACTLxx controllers?  Is it that QAPCTLxx is used for
specifically-named devices (telnet device=TOMH), whereas QVIRCxxxx would
be for defaulted names (telnet screen device name=blank, defaulting to
QPADEVxxxx)?

Tom

I _knew_ I had that backward....

Thanks

Tom


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.