|
The IFS is a pretty poor performer under OS/400. Now, using the same disk drives and controllers, and carve out a portion of them to be used by an IXS card running some sort of Windows; and you'll get a lot better performance. Rob Berendt -- Group Dekko Services, LLC Dept 01.073 PO Box 2000 Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com "Tim Kredlo" <TKredlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 03/14/2005 08:09 PM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To <MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject Opening XL files List people, Is it typical for it to take about twice as long to open an Excel file that resides on the IFS as it does to open the 'same' file residing on another Windows machine on the same local network? 4 seconds vs. 2 seconds is not an issue, but 40 seconds vs. 20 seconds gets to be a problem with users with a low patience level (me). Tim Kredlo -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.