RE: Did we have another name change?

["Haase, Justin C." <justin.haase@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That sticker on the front - a member of the System i family of servers -
FANTASTIC idea.  Wow!!!  Let's get it done - I like it.  If IBM won't do
it, there's a place that makes bumper stickers down the street.


--
Justin C. Haase - iSeries System Engineer
IBM Certified Systems Expert - System i
Kingland Systems Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Trevor Perry
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 7:47 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Did we have another name change?

Tom,

This was my point at the Town Hall meeting at COMMON. I asked IBM to
give us the tools so we can (a) become a community again, and (b) can
call this 
platform+OS a consistent name.

We have the name - System i - now, we need to come together as a System
i 
community. Are you willing to call your AS/400 a System i? Are you
willing 
to call you iSeries a System i?

I recently suggested that IBM give us stickers/labels to put on the
front of 
our AS/400s and iSeries. This would include the AS/400 label and the
words 
"a System i server". Maybe then, we can SEE that it is part of the new 
family, and our vernacular would change. One can only hope

Trevor
P.S. Here is my suggestion 
http://www.angustheitchap.com/Angus/Blog/C99E992D-2517-4630-89FF-5051135
D59BF_files/i.008.jpg


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Re: Did we have another name change?


> midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>   7. Re: Did we have another name change? (Trevor Perry)
>>
>>There have been only two name changes since 1988. How is that going
too 
>>far?
>>rEdiculous?
>
> Trevor:
>
> Generally, I agree. In fact, I almost wrote the same reply as you did
and 
> as I have in the past. But I realized that I almost missed the almost 
> hidden question --
>
>>>   And, if we don't know
>>> what
>>> to call, how is the general public going to know what to call it, or

>>> even
>>> what "it" is?
>
> I'm not sure that the name change is the problem. As you said, this is

> only the second change in almost 20 years. The problem is the
confusion 
> among the users of the system.
>
> This is an area that IBM has failed in its approach. Somehow "we" are 
> confused. IBM's inability to keep "us" clear in our own minds is
regularly 
> evident.
>
> Tom Liotta