RE: Longer Savsys?

["Haase, Justin C." <justin.haase@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I thought the journal itself had to be in QSYS, while the receivers can
be anywhere you'd like.  Can't find the doc to be sure of myself, and it
is quite early on Monday yet.

Justin C. Haase
Solution Manager - Technical Services
Kingland Systems Corporation


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of fbocch2595@xxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:01 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Longer Savsys?

Has anyone moved the audit journal to a library other than qsys?  Any
issues/problems when doing that?  
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: fbocch2595@xxxxxxx
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: Longer Savsys?


Hi Kirk, no to 1 and I'm on an 825.  
 
I checked BRM and since we turned on the audit journal the savsys has
been 
running longer, why does updating the audit journal extend the runtime
of 
savsys?
 
Thanks   
 
-----Original Message-----
From: kirkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: Longer Savsys?


#1 Did you IPL 'before' the save?  The system sets a bit after it has 
touched an object for the first time. An IPL clears that bit. I've heard

do an IPL and then save can make them longer. IBM suggests doing the IPL

after any saves.

#2 I haven't tried this to see, Are you running a 5xx? I thinking maybe 
the save kicked the in process to install Firmware PTFs (MHxxxxx)