So to review. a) You made the system do more work during the savsys and b) you gave the system significantly more to save. Result: The save took longer. Does that about cover it? :-)
So it would appear the question is answered and you learned something in 
the process.  I love it when a plan comes together!
- Larry

fbocch2595@xxxxxxx wrote:
When we changed the auditing values It turns out that we changed the auditing ctl to objaud we flooded the journals with the zc/zr entries which increases the # of entries and the jrnrcv's are in qsys. -----Original Message-----
From: fbocch2595@xxxxxxx
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: Longer Savsys?





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact copyright@midrange.com.

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.