RE: Setting for system value QLIBLCKLVL survey

["Mike Cunningham" <mcunning@xxxxxxx>]

Very true, but it your job has a lock on an object in the library then
the library can't be deleted. For interactive jobs I can see the real
possibility of a library in the list but the user has not run an app
that needs that library yet that day and so the library could be deleted
out from under their job and cause the job to bomb. But with this value
set to not lock the library it does make it possible to slip in an
upgrade of something that needs to delete the library (or more likely
rename the current one and install the new one) without kicking all
users off the system. 

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Al Barsa
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:15 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Setting for system value QLIBLCKLVL survey


Changing this system value during the execution of you job means that
someone could delete a library in your library list, killing your job.
This a very poor system value to change IMHO.

Al

Al Barsa, Jr.
Barsa Consulting Group, LLC

400>390

"i" comes before "p", "x" and "z"
e gads

Our system's had more names than Elizabeth Taylor!

914-251-1234
914-251-9406 fax

http://www.barsaconsulting.com
http://www.taatool.com
http://www.as400connection.com



 

             "Mike Cunningham"

             <mcunning@xxxxxxx

             >
To 
             Sent by:                  "Midrange Systems Technical

             midrange-l-bounce         Discussion"

             s@xxxxxxxxxxxx            <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

 
cc 
 

             05/29/2007 01:09
Subject 
             PM                        Setting for system value
QLIBLCKLVL 
                                       survey

 

             Please respond to

             Midrange Systems

                 Technical

                Discussion

             <midrange-l@midra

                 nge.com>

 

 





Our system value for "Library locking level" (QLIBLCKLVL) is currently
set to "1-Lock libraries in the search list". After reading about what
this controls I am thinking it should be set to "0" to not lock the
library search list. Our typical user has around 20 libraries in the
library list. Before I changed it I thought I would check to see how the
rest of the readers on the list set this value.



Thanks

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.