Re: SQL Table with non-unique key - possible? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: SQL Table with non-unique key - possible?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:38:27 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I don't believe so. Why? If the answer is that is the way the DDS file
was defined I tend to question why it was defined that way? Was the DDS
file also defined with REUSEDLT(*NO) and depended on it? If so, add
another field, like an official SQL "sequence" field and use that. Add
that to the list of fields that make up the primary key. Or would that
baffle the existing applications?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: SQL Table with non-unique key - possible? , Jeff Crosby

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.