RE: Unexplained level check problem -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Unexplained level check problem
From: "Jeff Crosby" <jlcrosby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 14:57:46 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

It was me.

If you recreated a DDS defined file via DDL, _AND_ it contained date data
type field(s), the format level id was not the same. IBM issued a PTF that
fixed it so that the format level identifiers were the same, BUT, IIRC, it
only worked if it was an *ISO defined date field.

This was V5R4. I do not remember the PTF number. Been a year or more.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.