From: Steve Richter
What decision would that have been and why was it made?
Well, Stuart Milligan, vice president of business development, Databorough implied that IBM decided not make RPG a fully OO language like Java and C#.
So what's the point? Databorough develops tools to convert RPG to Java. So his rant against RPG may be a thinly veiled attempt to get developers to use his tools.
Personally, I'm grateful that RPG is a procedurally oriented language, doesn't carry the overhead of a fully OO language, and hasn't evolved into bloatware like Java and MS .net runtime environments.
On the other hand, I'm also very grateful that ILE supports encapsulation, which is the first and most important attribute of OO design. IBM has found the right middle ground.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.