The things that you're as WELL AWARE of as many of the rest of us include:
1. This o/s is known (thanks to IBM ineptness) by many names, and these
names are ACCEPTED BY INDUSTRY when talking about the broad category of
systems that run OS/400, uh, I mean i/os, un, I mean..... All of us (with
one or 2 exceptions) generally seem to understand what the others are
talking about.
2. Also as I believe you're well aware of, when IBM says "POWER" they're
specifically referring and wanting you to be running AIX. To IBM, os/400(or
whatever) is and has been just another add on legacy (THEIR TERMS) o/s.
Keep in mind that AIX, is just another mutation of UNIX - BOTH operating
environments which have been around for as long or longer than CPF or OS/400
- yet for some reason IBM hasn't decided to morph their names along with the
seasons... Ever wonder why?
OK, back to our naps...I'm sure trevor will have some retort but I'm sure my
spam filter is still working... :)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
