Re: Future of SNDSMTPEMM -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Future of SNDSMTPEMM
From: John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:57:55 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Kurt Anderson
<Kurt.Anderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I've been using SNDSMTPEMM for emailing from our Power 7 and it works great with one caveat: the message (NOTE) is limited to 400 characters.

I'm sure the limitation was not technically motivated. That is,
there's no technical reason why they couldn't just pick a larger
number.

But I suppose it could have been a design decision. Maybe they figured
"hey, this is almost three tweets' worth; who's going to read more
than that in one shot anyway?".

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Future of SNDSMTPEMM , Kurt Anderson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.