Thanks for the responses. It seemed odd to me to have such a small character count limitation for an email. For me it mainly comes down to using html & css to make pretty (yet informative) emails when a process has an error.
Kurt Anderson
Lead iSeries Developer - Application Development, Service Delivery Platform
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Yeung
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 11:58 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Future of SNDSMTPEMM
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Kurt Anderson <Kurt.Anderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've been using SNDSMTPEMM for emailing from our Power 7 and it works great with one caveat: the message (NOTE) is limited to 400 characters.
I'm sure the limitation was not technically motivated. That is, there's no technical reason why they couldn't just pick a larger number.
But I suppose it could have been a design decision. Maybe they figured "hey, this is almost three tweets' worth; who's going to read more than that in one shot anyway?".
John Y.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
midrange.com
